Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967

GS-III | Internal Security


Why in the news?

The Supreme court granted bail to activists accused in the Bhima-Koregaon case citing that ‘mere holding of literature propagating violent acts or participation in seminars will not constitute a terror act’ under UAPA,1967.

Bhima-Koregaon case:

·       Bhima-Koregaon is a small village in Maharashtra, which marked the defeat of Peshwa army headed by Peshwa Bajirao II by a Dalit-dominated British army on January 1, 1818.

·       The victory was marked by erecting a pillar called Vijay Sthamb (victory pillar) by the East India Company for those who fought for them in the battle.

·       This incident is considered by the Mahars, the Dalit community as “Dalit affirmation against Brahminical tyranny” and a “symbol of Dalit pride”.

·       Dalit groups commemorated the Bhima-Koregaon battle on January 1 every year where numerous people of Dalit descent would come to pay their respect.

·       The 200th year of the battle was commemorated in 2018, witnessed by an extensive gathering of people.

·       Unfortunately, violent altercations broke out between Dalit and Maratha groups during the celebration, leading to the death of an individual and injuries and damages to many others.

·       The start of the animosity simmered when destruction of Govind Gopal Mahar’s memorial was discussed in a major public conference held on December 31,2017.

·       After the violence, cases were registered for “provocative speeches” made in the public conference held, with all the accused activists were detained, the investigation taken over by NIA and booked under UAPA,1967 and IPC sections

Ø  153 A (promoting enmity between groups), 

Ø  505 (1)(b) (with intent to cause, or which is likely to cause fear or alarm to the public). 

Ø  117 (abetting commission of an offense by the public or by more than ten persons). 

Ø  Section 13 (unlawful activities),

Ø  Section 16 (terrorist act), 18 (conspiracy), 

Ø  Section 18B (recruiting of any person or persons for the terrorist act), 

Ø  Section 20 (being a member of a terrorist gang or organisation) and 

Ø  Section 39 (offence relating to support given to terrorist organisations) of the UAPA.

 

 

What are the provisions of UAPA, 1967?

·         Prior to UAPA amendment 2004, terrorist activities were dealt by the now repealed

      1)     Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 (TADA)

      2)   Prevention of Terrorism Act, 2002 (POTA) 

·         UAPA Amendment, 2014:
The 1967 anti-terror law was amended in 2014 by introducing a dedicated Chapter (Chapter IV) towards punishing terrorist activities and empowered the National Investigating Agencies and the state agencies.

·         The Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Amendment Act, 2019
Section 35 of UAPA was amended this provision to allow the government to categorise individuals as terrorists besides earlier provision of categorising organisations only as terror groups. Once the person is so categorized, their name will be added to Schedule 4 of the Act, a step to tackle terrorism and Naxalism in the country.

Provisions of the Act:

1)      Indulgence of an individual in “unlawful activities” shall attract a punishment of imprisonment extending to 10 years, and for which an association could be declared unlawful.

2)     The Unlawful activities shall include, any activity

              a.      which is intended or supports any claim to bring about on any ground whatsoever the cession of a part of
              the territory of India from the Union or which incites any individuals to bring about such cession or
              secession;

b.      which disclaims or questions the sovereignty of India in respect of any part of the territory of India

c.       which disrupts or is intended to disrupt the integrity of India 

3)     Any Indian or foreign national charged under UAPA is liable for punishment under this Act, irrespective of the location of crime/offense committed

4)     UAPA will be applicable to the offenders in the same manner, even if the crime is committed on foreign land, outside India.

5)     Under Section 43D of the act, an accused can be detained under Police custody for 30 days and under Judicial custody for a period of 180 days without filing a chargesheet.

Challenges associated with the act:

1)      Low rates of convictions accompanied by large number of cases filed under UAPA over the years.

   o   National Crime Records Bureau (NCRB) that in 2019, 1,226 cases were filed under the UAPA, a 33 per cent increase from 2016 with the average conviction rate over the five-year period (2015-2019) is 2.19%

2)     Violation of Fundamental Rights of the citizens:

   o   An individual may be identified as a terrorist without any judicial scrutiny and even before the commencement of a trial. Thus, it is violative of

§  Right to equality (Article 14)

§  free speech (Article 19)

§  Right to Life (Article 21) with Right to Reputation being an integral aspect of it.

3)     “Manifestly arbitrary” provisions and a very broad definition of “unlawful activity”.

The definition of ‘unlawful activity’ includes ‘disaffection against India’ which does not have a defined meaning under the Act and can be used to target anyone or curb popular dissent.

4)     UAPA offers the State “excessive and overwhelming powers to act against groups and persons” who criticise “the governing party or majoritarian attitudes.

5)     Inclusion of ‘criticism of the government’, even though it might not pose a threat to the public order, security, sovereignty, or integrity of India, gives a wide discretion for the application of the law.

6)     Stringent Bail Provisions:

Golden thread of common law criminal jurisprudence: a person is innocent until proven guilty

      ·         This has been completely divorced by the act.

      ·         The law’s total ban on anticipatory bail and the very impossible task of obtaining normal release under it had a “chilling impact” on the right to free speech.

      ·         Great power entitled by the provisions of the UAPA, needs to be exercised with great responsibility and restraint to ensure that the protection of constitutional rights of individuals are not given due consideration and importance due to arbitrary action.

      ·         constitutionality of Section 43D, which mandates that a person shall not be released on bail if the court is of the opinion that there are reasonable grounds for believing that the accusation against a person is “prima facie” true is questionable since the Act is not a law enacted for preventive detention.

Supreme Court verdicts on the Act:

1)      Arup Bhuyan’s case

·         Court had held that ‘mere membership of a banned organisation will not make a person a criminal unless he resorts to violence or incites people to violence or creates public disorder by violence or incitement to violence’.

2)     Thwaha Faisal Case, 2021:

·         Mere membership or support to a terrorist organisation cannot be considered an offence.

·         Allegations of conspiracy based ob behaviour of the individual or possession of material is not enough to file a charge sheet against the accused.

3)     Asif Iqbal Tanha case (2021):

·         UAPA is meant to apply only to exceptional cases and not as substitutes for ordinary penal law

·         A distinction should exist between the state of exception and the state of normalcy

·         The state’s action to confuse “protest” for “terrorist activity” was criticised by the judiciary.

·         The word “terrorism” has to be given a specific meaning that distinguishes it from offences that are dealt with under ordinary law.

  • Other Related News
  • Geography Geography
    Eprakram
  • Important Essay
  • Geography Geography

    Quick Links


    A Case for Kerala's Missing Elephants

    A Case for Kerala's Missing Elephants

    Why in the news?Kerala's recent enumeration revealed that the wild elephant population has decreased from 5706 in 2017 to 2386 in 2023, registering a steep decline of 58% in the state.Possible reasons attributed to the decrease in the population:1
    Bharat (BH) Series Number plate

    Bharat (BH) Series Number plate

    1.       Bharat Series is a new numbering series that will be used for vehicle registration across the nation, especially for those vehicles that frequently shift from one state to another due to their owner’s tra
    Quiet Diplomacy Could Ease South China Sea Tensions

    Quiet Diplomacy Could Ease South China Sea Tensions

    What is Quiet Diplomacy?1.   “Quiet diplomacy” refers to one state’s efforts to influence the behaviour of another state through discreet negotiations or actions. 2.    It operates behind the scenes and may rely on&n
    Disaster Preparedness During Floods

    Disaster Preparedness During Floods

    Why in the News?·       High precipitation in the upper and lower catchment area of R.Yamuna has led to devastating floods in the National capital.·       The Central Water Co
    Indo-France Relations

    Indo-France Relations

    Indo-France Relations:1)      Convergence of Indo-pacific strategies of India and France●       France is a resident power in the Indian ocean with 2.7sq million km EEZ●   &n
    PM MODI's visit to the US - GAINS TO INDIA

    PM MODI's visit to the US - GAINS TO INDIA

    Why in the News?Prime Minister Narendra Modi visit to the USA has helped India showcase its Cultural heritage, Diplomatic prowess and its growing influence on the world stage.Key outcomes of the Diplomatic visit:1)      A
    CPI basket conceals the inflation picture

    CPI basket conceals the inflation picture

    Why in the News?India's consumer price index (CPI) inflation rose to 4.81% in June 2023, higher than expectations but still below the RBI's upper tolerance limit of 6%. The spike was driven by a less supportive base and a surge in vegetable prices
    A big step in reducing the risk of disasters

    A big step in reducing the risk of disasters

    Why in the news?India has established the first G20 Disaster Risk Reduction Working Group.What is the rationale behind its establishment?The consequences of climate change are resulting in devastating disasters across the world.●    &n
    Custodial Violence

    Custodial Violence

    Why in the News?Two persons have allegedly died of custodial violence in Delhi and Faridabad in separate cases.Custodial Violence & death:●       Includes torture, death and other excesses in police custody or
    Migration In India

    Migration In India

    Why in the News?The Bombay High Court has taken Suo motu cognisance of exploitation of intra-state migrant workforce in Maharastra (MH).What is the background of the issue?1.    People from Drought-affected and water-scarce regions of Ma